Thursday, May 31, 2012

Meeting: NAS at VA Beach




Public Briefing on Uranium Mining in Virginia
Report Release/Public Briefing



When: May 31, 2012 - May 31, 2012 6:30 PM (Rally begins at 5:30 pm near the Hilton Hotel




Where: Hilton Virginia Beach Oceanfront (3001 Atlantic Avenue, Virginia Beach, VA 23451)


Parking: 31st Street Parking Garage: This garage is open from 8AM to midnight. Rates are $2 for up to an hour, $4 for up to two hours, $6 for up to three hours and $10 for daily parking. (*$2 discount parking after 5pm for Virginia Beach residents


Info:  The National Academy of Sciences' National Research Council will hold a briefing to present the findings of its recently released report, Uranium Mining in Virginia, and take questions from the public beginning at 6:30 p.m. ET.

http://dels.nas.edu/Upcoming-Event/Public-Briefing-Uranium-Mining/DELS-BESR-09-06/6101

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

U Mining Info


 floyd u mining news #139

Virginia Beach hearing set on uranium mining Thursday  MAY31st   The National Academy of Sciences will hold a May 31 hearing in Virginia Beach to give a public briefing on its uranium mining report looking at Virginia.  http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2012/may/20/virginia-beach-hearing-set-uranium-mining-ar-1927677/

Public Hearing on Uranium Mining  Monday, June 18th, 2012 @ 6:00 pm @ Chatham High School, Chatham, Va.   This is an extremely IMPORTANT MEETING of the Governor’s newly appointed Uranium Working Group (UWG).   http://croatanearthfirst.com/2012/04/27/public-hearing-on-uranium-mining/   

You may have noticed the scarcity of news regarding uranium mining and milling in Virginia.  What has happened?  Did Virginia Uranium fold tent?  If they folded any tent, it was to move into their new residence at the Governor's mansion in Richmond. Walter Coles said, "If it cannot be done safely, it will not be done."  No study/report to date has said uranium mining and milling can be done safely in VA and there will NEVER be any credible scientist or engineer that would make such a claim.  So, back to the drawing board for VUI.  That would be...drafting regulations.

Since the Governor's Uranium Working Group was formed, transparency has gone from opaque to black-out.  But, UWG and VUI are likely getting to know each other quite well as they draft a regulatory framework for the benefit of one corporation.  I encourage you to go to the UWG website http://www.uwg.vi.virginia.gov/ to see how little information it contains.  Other websites and blogs posted recent studies/reports.  Perhaps the only informative piece of information found on their website is their Comprehensive Workplan.  It shows the partnership of the UWG and VUI as they draft the regulations that will lead to uranium mining and milling in Virginia, dry up wells, contaminate surface water, despoil the air and cost taxpayers big bucks for the few shekels realized from the operation which will quickly disappear after the first disaster.

In June, there will be something...who knows WTH it will be...in Chatham VA.  I am guessing it will be about as informative as everything else the Coal and Energy Commission has conducted...not.  Another dog and Pony show to appear to give 2 craps about human health, property values, wiping out agriculture, and making us a mining town.  The June D&P show will feature, as best anyone can tell, DMME's contribution to the regulatory framework.

June, 18 2012 - 6:00 P.M.
Virginia Coal and Energy Commission - Uranium Mining Subcommittee
Chatham High School, 100 Cavalier Circle, Chatham


DEQ will present its contribution for the regulatory framework in August...no location known at present. 

I am in hopes the Virginia Dept. of Health (VDH) will hold its D&P show in Chatham.  Its task will be to explain away issues such as lowering water tables in public and private wells, evaluation of existing standards for safe disposal of mine wastes (surely VUI has told them...NO PROBLEM!).  One of VDH regulatory contributions will be to "establishing an active epidemiological surveillance program for communities to monitor and measure short and long term effects to exposures to radioactive material and toxic substances as might be encountered in mining and milling operations of the type proposed for VA."  Now, just what the hell does that mean?  In fact...what is proposed for VA?  Oh, the VDH will also address "changes to cancer and congenital malformation reporting."  Again I ask, WTH? 

The C&EC, its uranium subcommittee and the UWG know uranium mining and milling cannot be done safely.  So, their plan is to monitor how well or poorly it occurs.  This is bull-crap. 

Where's the press on this?  Why are they silent?  Have they even tried to find out what is going on with the UWG?  Are we to get our information through VUI and UWG press releases? km


Lead contamination found in storm’s main path  http://www.joplinglobe.com/tornadomay2011/x1415461797/Lead-contamination-found-in-storm-s-main-path  food for thought.  if was a radioactive contaminant, from uranium mining and/or milling dispersed by tornado, how would Pittsylvania County handle building permits.  How will the UWG or GA handle issues such as this?  go to Chatham High on June 18 to ask. km


Uranium Mining and Milling in Virginia WHAT YOU SHOULD EXPECT!   This is the video from May 3rd.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hYzunPNc5Q     
Speaker: Sarah Fields  May 3, 2012   The Institute for Advanced Learning and Research, Danville Virginia


Jaczko Quits as NRC Chairman After Criticism of Management    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/05/21/bloomberg_articlesM4DN706K50YD01-M4DR0.DTL

Gregory Jaczko Resigns: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Steps Down    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/21/gregory-jaczko-resigns-nrc-nuclear-regulatory-commission_n_1531805.html

New anti-uranium group forms    http://www.sovanow.com/index.php?/news/article/new_anti-uranium_group_forms/

Monday, May 28, 2012

Early Stories of VA Uranium Mining Problems

Text Sat, 1 Dec 2007
A citizens' group has criticized a proposal that Virginia officials study the safety of uranium mining .

Text Tue, 4 Mar 2008

RICHMOND - The proposal to study mining of Pittsylvania County's huge uranium deposit died Monday in the House Rules committee when Southside Virginia delegates said no, with backing from House leaders.


Text Sat, 12 Jan 2008

RICHMOND - A 15-member panel would study the risks and benefits of mining uranium in Pittsylvania County and elsewhere in Virginia if the General Assembly approves a bill filed this week.Source: The News & Advance
Text Wed, 16 Jan 2008
Pittsylvania County opponents of uranium mining are circulating word that the uranium company organized by a local landowner has become a Canadian company with Canadian owners.

Text Fri, 1 Feb 2008
RICHMOND - Legislation that would set up a study commission on mining uranium was rewritten in a state Senate subcommittee Thursday, with two environmental organizations and a citizens' group participating.
Text Sat, 15 Mar 2008
The last remnant of this year's attempt to win General Assembly approval of a uranium mining study was wiped out in a conference committee this week.
Text Thu, 6 Nov 2008
A state panel voted today to study whether uranium can be safely mined in Virginia.
Text Wed, 3 Dec 2008
The resort city of Virginia Beach is taking a stand against uranium mining , fearful it could threaten its water supply.
Text Tue, 24 Mar 2009
A state panel is considering what should be included in a study of the impact of uranium mining in Virginia.
Text Thu, 14 May 2009
The Virginia Coal and Energy Commission's Uranium Mining Subcommittee meets next week in Richmond to mull a proposed final draft of a study that would determine whether uranium can be mined and milled safely in the commonwealth.
Text Fri, 16 Apr 2010
The process has begun for the second part of a study focusing on the socioeconomic impacts of uranium mining and milling in Virginia.
Text Wed, 23 Jun 2010
CHATHAM - The Virginia Coal and Energy Commission's Uranium Mining Subcommittee met at Chatham High School on Tuesday night, where residents filled the auditorium, and about 70 people spoke out on the scope of a proposed study to examine the socioeconomic impacts of uranium mining and milling.
Text Tue, 12 May 2009
Nearly everyone agrees that an independent study of the effects of proposed uranium mining in Pittsylvania County is a good step. But not everyone agrees on the study's framework and the order in which the various aspects of such a mining operation would be covered.
Text Fri, 4 Dec 2009
Virginia's uranium mining study has gotten the green light - but with conditions - from the National Research Council's Governing Board Executive Committee.
Text Thu, 19 Nov 2009
DANVILLE - Uranium mining opponents say flooding like the type that occurred in Pittsylvania County last week would pollute the water supply if uranium mining and milling take place at Coles Hill.
Text Tue, 27 Sep 2011
An environmental group is calling for more water studies of a proposed uranium site before legislators debate whether to lift the state moratorium on uranium mining .

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Stories by ProUranium Groups (Fairy Tales)

Comments by KM:  North Anna reactor seemd to be shut down more than it operated last year.
 
godanriver.com
 
Comments by KM:  Funny thing…the new clean energy, according to the pro-mining faction, is nuclear. An inconvenient fact the author may have overlooked is that uranium mining and milling in Southside will leave tons of toxic, hazardous AND radioactive wast...es.

The ultimate failure of VUI will likely mirror the rise and fall of Solyndra. Just like its predecessor Marline, VUI will likely "abandon" the project in one way or another; acquire its share of subsidies, cost taxpayers for implementing a regulatory structure, degrade air and water then leave us holding its bag of toxic, hazardous and radioactive wastes for thousands of years.

Comparing a roof of solar panel to uranium mining and milling? Please, say it ain't so.
 
godanriver.com
 

Saturday, May 26, 2012

FOIA regarding Pittsylvania and NRC

A Black and White Cartoon of a Man Stepping In Gum - Royalty Free Clipart Picture

Subject: FOIA regarding Pittsylvania and NRC


A recent Freedom Of Information Request to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) yielded the following.

 Click on link #1 to find a letter from  Pittsylvania Board of Supervisor Marshall Ecker requesting the NRC come to  Pittsylvania County to discuss regulations and answer questionshold a town
meeting.

Link #2 is the response. NRC will work only with the Uranium Working Group
(UWG).

This is convenient since the UWG does not answer to anyone but the
Governor.

Does this make you feel like dog pooh on the bottom of a shoe?

 That, it appears, is how Southside is regarded.
 

 http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1211/ML121170004.pdf

http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1210/ML121010049.pdf

Friday, May 25, 2012

Hiroaki KOIDE on Press Conference May 4th 2012




/7 Hiroaki KOIDE on Press Conference May 4th 2012
SD, 29 min 35 sec, in Japanese with English interpretation

Japanese Nuclear Scientist and Japanese and US medical doctors to discuss current radiological health conditions and concerns in Japan after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactor catastrophe.
WHAT: A press conference about the on-going, rarely publicized and still grave situation around the stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactors, featuring a nuclear scientist from Japan, and first hand medical reports of clinical and on site observations in Japan related to the Fukushima radiological contamination, with discussion of the immediate needs to protect Japanese citizens now living in contaminated areas, for better monitoring of radioactive content of food, and for the cessation of incineration and burying of radioactive tsunami rubble throughout Japan.

WHERE: Rissho Kosei-kai 320 East 39th Street, New York, NY 10016 (between First Ave. & Second Ave.)

WHEN: Friday, May 4, 2012, 10AM-11AM

WHO: Mr. Hiroaki Koide, Nuclear Reactor Specialist and Assistant Professor at Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute. After realizing in 1970 that nuclear power was extremely dangerous, Mr. Koide dedicated over 40 years of his career to educate the nuclear industry and the general public to stop nuclear reactors in Japan. After the nuclear disaster in Fukushima, he gained “rock star” status due to his tireless efforts in providing detailed analysis and honest suggestions to the Japanese community about the extent of the disaster. He will speak about the extremely dangerous conditions at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, including the concerns regarding the damaged Unit 4 irradiated fuel pool.

DETAILS: Hosted from Japan by Voices for Lively Spring, Human Rights Now, and Physicians for Social Responsibility, the best-known nuclear scientist and concerned medical doctors from Japan and USA will share their experiences and speak about the on-going nuclear crisis in Fukushima.

They will discuss the under-reported health consequences after the nuclear disaster, health risks resulting from inadequate food safety standards, and the environmental dispersion of radioactive materials by government burning of radioactive disaster debris. Voices for Lively Spring, a Japanese citizens’ group, Physicians for Social Responsibility, a US and international medical NGO, and Human Rights Now, a Japanese international human rights NGO, feel that the international community is not adequately informed about the evolving “current status” and the remaining serious problems in Japan after the nuclear disaster.

The nuclear scientist and medical doctors from Japan and US will be available for media interviews.

http://vimeo.com/41635177

Thursday, May 24, 2012

HOMESTAKE-MILAN AND UNITED NUCLEAR-CHURCH ROCK URANIUM MILL TAILINGS PILES


GROUNDWATER RESTORATION LONG BEYOND CLOSURE AT THE HOMESTAKE-MILAN AND UNITED NUCLEAR-CHURCH ROCK URANIUM MILL TAILINGS PILES, NEW MEXICO, USA: FULL-SCALE PROGRAMS REQUIRING MORE THAN 20 YEARS OF ACTIVE TREATMENT

In: "Proceedings of Conference on Uranium Mining and Hydrogeology - II", Claudia Helling, et. al. editors, Technical University -Freiberg, Saxony, Germany, September, 1998
Wm. Paul Robinson(1)
(1) Wm. Paul Robinson is Research Director, Southwest Research and Information Center, P. O. Box 4524, Albuquerque, NM 87106
Abstract
Since as early as 1975, groundwater contamination from New Mexico uranium mill tailings has been investigated with two sites - Homestake-Milan and United Nuclear- Church Rock - showing severe enough groundwater damage to merit listing on the US Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund National Priority List - a nationwide list based on severity of pollution and water resource usefulness. These two sites provide valuable case studies for the first - 1950s - and second - 1970s - generations of uranium mill tailings facilities demonstrating the severity of contamination which ineffective control can allow and the challenge of full scale groundwater restoration. While the groundwater restoration at these sites began in the 1970s and 1980s, active treatment is anticipated into the 21st century.

This paper summarizes the groundwater restoration programs at two of these sites - Homestake Mining Company's (HMC) Milan Mill (now called the "Grants Project") and United Nuclear Corporation's (UNC) Church Rock Mill. The two sites are summarized with respect to operations, groundwater impact, tailings disposal systems, hydrogeological characteristics of the site and affected areas, applicable standards, and remedial technology applied. This review provides a basis for initial comparisons with uranium mill tailings groundwater restoration challenges outside the USA.

These sites provide an important benchmark the complexity of restoration at for large-scale uranium mill tailings sites. The longevity of the restoration efforts demonstrate the results of low-intensity responses to contamination upon detection and delayed enforcement actions. These "witnesses" to the value of effective pollution prevention in tailings design and full review and monitoring of tailings operations, have potential to be models of effective groundwater restoration.
Introduction

Home to 45% of USA uranium production, New Mexico and its resident uranium producers established seven uranium mills and tailings piles, each with a extensive pattern of ground water contamination. Two of the site, HMC's Milan Mill - now called the "Grants Project" - and UNC's - Church Rock Mill, have been included on the USEPA's Superfund National Priority List - a nationwide list of sites ranked on the basis of severity of pollution and usefulness of affected water resources - are the focus of this paper.

Both sites are subject to groundwater restoration requirements of New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission (NMWQCC) groundwater regulations, (USNRC) uranium mill tailings reclamation criteria - 10CFR20 Appendix A - and USEPA's "Superfund" Program. These groundwater restoration programs are in addition to site-wide surface remediation, including tailings pile regrading, stabilization and capping programs required by the USNRC under authority of the 1978 US Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) as active sites - Title II. As "active sites" in operation when UMTRCA became law, the Grants Project and Church Rock facility's costs of compliance USNRC, EPA and NMWQCC requirements are borne by the site owner-operator, rather than USA and State-government funded reclamation as with "inactive - Title I - sites".

Groundwater investigations at both sites detected groundwater contamination in the late 1970's. EPA investigations near the Homestake-Grants site demonstrated dramatically increased levels of uranium, radium, chloride, molybdenum, nitrate and selenium. These 1975 analyses of ground water in residential drinking water wells downgradient of the mill showed selenium concentrations up to 3.42 mg/l - more than 300 times the maximum recommended for drinking water. Extensive groundwater contamination at the UNC-Church Rock tailings was first detected in 1979, soon after the mill reopened following repair of 10 meter breach in the tailings dam. Significant levels of chloride, sulfate, nitrate, radium and thorium were among the many elevated constituents detected in either alluvial or bedrock aquifer systems.

Both sites continue to undergo groundwater restoration long after demolition of the mill facilities and closure of surface reclamation of the tailings piles. Progress to date indicates a requirements for further groundwater treatment into the 21st century.
Site Overviews

The HMC-Grants operation processed 3,500 ton of uranium ore per day in an alkaline leach mill from 1958 - 1990, producing two tailings piles, a 1,200,000 ton "inactive pile" and a 21,000,000 ton active pile, both which were unlined. The large tailings pile was constructed using a "ring-dike" system, with a small starter "ring" raised with cyclone-separated tailings continuously over the 32 year life of the operation to create a 30 meter tall, 100 hectare pile.

The tailings liquids were confined within the rectangular "ring dike" of tailings on top of the pile, substantially increasing the hydrostatic force carrying seepage through the unlined pile into the underlying alluvial aquifer. Restoration at this third largest uranium mill tailing sites in the USA has included extraction of contaminated fluid at the downgradient end of the plume and injection of clean water between the pile and the plume margin to create an artificial ground water mound. Alternative water supplies have been provided to residents of the affected downgradient residential communities for more than 15 years.

Please read all the article:
http://www.sric.org/mining/docs/Umills.html